CEO of Progress Energy Says Coal Plants are Needed In the Future
Written by Glenn Pearston   
Saturday, 06 June 2009 14:51
Jeff Lyash, chairman and CEO of Progress Energy Florida, said Wednesday that there is no cost effective way to leave behind coal fired plants entirely. We have to conserve coal as an energy source in the mix, he said. He added that it is probably going to continue providing thirty to forty percent of the United State's energy for the near future. Lyash said that a steadily growing need for electricity requires nuclear, gas and coal along with alternative fuels to meet growing needs.  Lyash was speaking to some community leaders from levy, Citrus and Marion counties when he said the near future will hold unprecedented challenges for United States utilities. He said that the need for "green" energy is undoubtedly a priority, but that it is unreasonable to think that we could rule out coal fuel entirely. "Energy consumption will grow by twenty to thirty percent over the next twenty years," he said.

Global warming and other environmental issues, along with tough environmental management will force excessive burdens on utilities and consumers alike, he said.

Lyash said that concentrations of carbon dioxide are unquestionably higher at present than they were twenty, fifty, one hundred years ago.

Addressing energy needs and environmental concerns is a matter of economic necessity and national security, Lyash said.

Lyash continued that, alternative sources like wind, geothermal, and solar will sooner or later be part of our energy mix, although it will require a higher level of technology than that currently available. The short-term expectations are lower than the long-term, he said.

Nuclear power provides approximately twenty percent of the United State's electricity, this will need to double in the not too distant future to meet concerns regarding Greenhouse Gases, Lyash said.

Coal and gas fired plants emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, nuclear plants don't. Lyash said nuclear plants are a solution for generating clean, emission-free electricity.

Progress Energy said last month construction will be postponed for as long as two years, the company said the Federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission refused to approve work on the foundation before issuance of the operating and construction license. Progress Energy said that they couldn't even begin excavation without the license.

Progress Energy says that if the two reactors are constructed it will close two coal fired plants at Crystal River. The two reactors will produce more electricity than the two plants and produce no carbon dioxide, Lyash said.

Anti-nuclear organizations, like Nuclear Information and Resource Service, say sources like wind,geothermal and solar provide cheaper, faster, cleaner and safer approach for lowering amounts of greenhouse emissions than nuclear.

Lyash said that these alternative fuels should make up approximately twenty percent of the United State's energy mix. We have to support a technology that would capture the carbon in coal and process it, we can't really eliminate coal, but we may possibly gain the technology needed to extract the harmful gases in the emissions from coal. This may be a possibility in the future.


Glenn Pearston
Written on Saturday, 06 June 2009 14:51 by Glenn Pearston

Viewed 1478 times so far. Like this? Tweet it to your followers!

Rate this article

Latest articles from Glenn Pearston

Latest 'tweets' from Safe Nuclear Energy

  • RT @NuclearAnalyst U.S. Companies Buying Enriched Uranium From Russia - Nuclear Safety http://cli.gs/mvN3ut (via @tweetmeme) Link Friday, 19 June 2009 17:27
  • RT @NuclearAnalyst OakFlat DOS Nuclear Reactor Simulator Game - Nuclear Safety http://cli.gs/GhHAnv (via @tweetmeme) Link Friday, 19 June 2009 16:06
  • RT @NuclearAnalyst Senate Energy Committee Approves Energy Bill - Nuclear Safety http://tinyurl.com/nb22s8 (via @tweetmeme) Link Friday, 19 June 2009 12:18
  • RT @NuclearAnalyst Women Play a Key Role in Energy Future - Nuclear Safety http://cli.gs/DaGWHP (via @tweetmeme) Link Friday, 19 June 2009 11:53
  • RT @NuclearAnalyst Elmore County Idaho Wants Nuclear Plant on Snake River - Nuclear Safety http://tinyurl.com/kwksx6 (via @tweetmeme) Link Friday, 19 June 2009 10:05

 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Official Resources

site-nrc
The US Nuclear Regulator Commission website has a wealth of information on the plants, safety protocols, and more. Link
site-iaea
The International Atomic Energy Agency is the primariy international nuclear authority focussing on nuclear verification and security, safety and technology transfer. Link
site-nnsa
The National Nuclear Security Administration deals with military use of nuclear power and nuclear weapons safety and proliferation. Link