Lack of Water Rights Will Not Slow Utah Nuclear Projects
Written by Glenn Pearston   
Thursday, 18 June 2009 12:28
A lack of readily available water and the complete lack of water rights in the area of southern Utah is not going to stall mining for oil shale or nuclear power plant development projects. Sate officials and industry staff relayed to a legislative committees Wednesday that these hurdles can be overcome. Kent Jones, Utah's state engineer, recommended the seeking of water rights that are presently under the control of other people as the Unitah Basin capacity is at capacity. Director of Utah Division of Water Resources, Dennis Strong conveyed the limitation would not be allowed to place a constraint upon oil shale mining or nuclear power plant development. He felt that water presently ear marked for agriculture business could be obtained. Strong further stated that growing houses instead of crops was a decision that was common place.

Not everyone shared Strong's opinion. Tim DeChristopher, a student at the University of Utah and awaiting trial for disruption of BLM (Bureau of Land Management) auctions last winter, opposed Strong by saying that agri-businesses would suffer at the hands of deep pocket energy developers and were not in a financial position to fight the changes. DeChristopher stated that the change in water rights would leave agriculture abandoned and would negatively impact rural communities.

Dr. Laura Nelson, Chair of the Utah Mining Association made statements to the committee that reduced the water requirements for crude oil extraction from shale from 6 barrels of water per barrel of oil to 1.5 barrels through the use of modern technologies. She compared the making of a t-shirt to that of crude oil extraction in an attempt to show that the water requirements for mining are not that great.

Aaron Tilton, former state legislator and present CEO for Transition Power Development LLC said that nuclear power was a water wise use of water for energy production. He went on to say that present technologies require approximately 55,000 acre feet of water to cool a 3,000 megawatt reactor and he had obtained 30,000 acre feet presently.


Glenn Pearston
Written on Thursday, 18 June 2009 12:28 by Glenn Pearston

Viewed 1143 times so far. Like this? Tweet it to your followers!

Rate this article

Latest articles from Glenn Pearston

Latest 'tweets' from Safe Nuclear Energy

  • RT @NuclearAnalyst U.S. Companies Buying Enriched Uranium From Russia - Nuclear Safety http://cli.gs/mvN3ut (via @tweetmeme) Link Friday, 19 June 2009 17:27
  • RT @NuclearAnalyst OakFlat DOS Nuclear Reactor Simulator Game - Nuclear Safety http://cli.gs/GhHAnv (via @tweetmeme) Link Friday, 19 June 2009 16:06
  • RT @NuclearAnalyst Senate Energy Committee Approves Energy Bill - Nuclear Safety http://tinyurl.com/nb22s8 (via @tweetmeme) Link Friday, 19 June 2009 12:18
  • RT @NuclearAnalyst Women Play a Key Role in Energy Future - Nuclear Safety http://cli.gs/DaGWHP (via @tweetmeme) Link Friday, 19 June 2009 11:53
  • RT @NuclearAnalyst Elmore County Idaho Wants Nuclear Plant on Snake River - Nuclear Safety http://tinyurl.com/kwksx6 (via @tweetmeme) Link Friday, 19 June 2009 10:05

 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Official Resources

site-nrc
The US Nuclear Regulator Commission website has a wealth of information on the plants, safety protocols, and more. Link
site-iaea
The International Atomic Energy Agency is the primariy international nuclear authority focussing on nuclear verification and security, safety and technology transfer. Link
site-nnsa
The National Nuclear Security Administration deals with military use of nuclear power and nuclear weapons safety and proliferation. Link